Olanzapine, an FDA-approved antipsychotic agent, has been shown to improve the prevention of nausea when added to a standard antiemetic.
Steve Powell, MD
Steve Powell, MD
Results of a recent randomized trial show that olanzapine (Zyprexa) significantly improved the prevention of nausea in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) when the agent is added to a standard antiemetic regimen.
Olanzapine is an FDA-approved antipsychotic agent that blocks multiple neurotransmitters. Some of the receptors that olanzapine blocks may be involved in nausea and vomiting, suggesting it might have clinically significant properties for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Known side effects of the agent with short-term use in its approved setting include mild sedation.
This phase III trial enrolled 380 chemotherapy-naïve patients being treated with HEC (either cisplatin or cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin). They were randomized to 2 groups, with 190 patients given 10 mg of olanzapine orally and 188 a matching placebo on days 1 through 4 of chemotherapy. All patients in both cohorts were treated with an antiemetic regimen of dexamethasone, aprepitant or fosaprepitant, and a 5-HT3—receptor antagonist as well.
The study’s primary endpoint of no nausea was assessed during 3 time periods: early assessment (0-24 hours), later assessment (25-120 hours), and overall (0-120 hours) after chemotherapy. Researchers were also interested in comparing complete response (no emesis and no use of rescue medication) in the 2 study arms over the 3 phases, as well as any toxicities related to olanzapine.
Patients were asked to keep daily records of episodes of vomiting or retching, the use of rescue therapy, and daily levels of nausea from the first day of chemotherapy through day 5. A study nurse also contacted each patient on days 2 through 5 to ask about and record any side effects related to the regimen.
In the olanzapine arm, 73.8% of patients experienced no nausea during the early assessment period versus 45.3% of patients with placebo (P = .002). During later assessment, nausea was prevented in 42.4% of patients with olanzapine, versus 25.4% in the control arm (P = .002), and during the overall period, no nausea was reported in 37.3% of patients receiving olanzapine compared with 21.9% with placebo (P = .002).
The complete response rate also was better with olanzapine compared with placebo during the early assessment phase (85.7% vs 64.6%, respectively; P <.001), the later assessment phase (66.9% vs 52.4%; P = .007), and over the entire period (63.6% vs 40.6%; P <.001).
“We’ve long known the nausea and vomiting that come along with chemotherapy are a major problem and affect the quality of life of our patients,” said study author Steven Powell, MD, in a statement. Powell is an oncologist at Sanford Health in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, and a community co-chair of the study. “The findings of this study, fortunately, provide physicians with a tool to better address the needs of those they are treating for cancer.”
In keeping with olanzapine’s known side effect profile, drowsiness was significantly increased on day 2 in the experimental arm and was severe in 5% of patients, the researchers reported; however, no patients stopped taking olanzapine as a result, and the study showed that sedation resolved after the first day, even though patients in the olanzapine arm were still taking the drug on days 3 and 4.
The researchers suggested that lower dosing of olanzapine (eg, 5 mg) represents an area for further study, adding that evaluating the agent only at the 10-mg dose is one limitation of this trial. In addition, they reported no significant differences between the 2 arms on the side effect of undesired increase in appetite on days 2 through 5 after chemotherapy.
Three grade 4 adverse events (AEs)—including 2 hematologic—were seen in the olanzapine arm and none in the placebo arm. Two grade 3 AEs occurred in the experimental arm—hyperglycemia and fatigue; in the placebo arm, 2 grade 3 AEs (diarrhea and abdominal pain) were observed. Notably, however, treating clinicians did not attribute any of the grade 3/4 AEs to the study drug.
Study authors explained that although previous research has shown that NK-1 receptor antagonists (aprepitant, fosaprepitant, netupitant, and rolapitant) provide significant control of early and later emesis in patients receiving HEC, “they appear to have been less effective in controlling nausea”—an unmet need. Based on the findings of this trial, they wrote, “Patients who received olanzapine were more likely than those who received placebo to be free of nausea and emesis in the early, later, and overall assessment periods.”
Reference
Navari RM, Qin R, Ruddy KJ, et al. Olanzapine for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(2):134-142.
Nursing Perspectives on Managing Toxicities With ADCs in Metastatic Gastric and Breast Cancers
September 1st 2022In this episode of "The Vitals," Sarah Donahue, MPH, NP, AOCNP; Jamie Carroll, APRN, CNP, MSN; Theresa Wicklin Gillespie, PhD, MA, RN, FAAN; and Elizabeth Prechtel-Dunphy, DNP, RN, ANP-BC, AOCN, exchange clinical pearls for treating patients receiving antibody-drug conjugates.
Increasing Awareness of Audiovestibular Adverse Events From Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
July 16th 2024Oncology nurses play a critical role in identifying and managing rare audiovestibular complications associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors to prevent permanent hearing loss and improve patients' quality of life.