Better Palliative Care Integration Needed for Clinical Trial Participants

Palliative care is an integral part of a cancer treatment plan and should not be dismissed for patients who are participating on clinical trials. In fact, a recent study presented at the 2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Meeting, showed that patients on phase I clinical trials tended to have improved quality of life (QOL) outcomes when they received palliative care.

“We all know that ASCO now recommends concurrent palliative care by a palliative care team within 8 weeks of diagnosis based on multiple randomized trials showing improved symptoms, improved quality of life, less depression and anxiety, despite increased prognostic awareness,” Thomas J. Smith, MD, FACP, FASCO, FAAHPM, professor of oncology at Johns Hopkins Medicine said, while presenting the research.

A total of 209 patients at Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center or City of Hope were given the palliative care intervention, which included two nurse-led visits to discuss physical, psychological, social, and spiritual issues, as well as advance directives. There was then an interdisciplinary team meeting to discuss each patient and make recommendations. There was also a single goals of care (GOC) discussion.

These patients were compared to the control arm, consisting of 218 patients. However, by the end of the study, there were 112 patients who completed the intervention arm and 113 patients in the control arm. Others withdrew/refused, were too ill to complete the study, died, or were lost to follow-up.

“In fact, the mean overall survival was 8.1 months. So that fits appropriately with palliative care and advanced medical directives,” Smith said.

The initial distress thermometer score was 3.6, “where most authorities recommend that 3 is a cutoff for an intervention,” Smith said.

Patients provided with palliative care showed less psychological distress (average score of 1.9 in the intervention arm, versus 1.2 in control; P = .03). Though not statistically significant, the palliative care grounp also had a trend toward improved QOL, as well (3.7 versus 1.6; P = .07).

Participants had high rates of symptom-management admissions (41.3%) and low rates of advance directive completion (39%). A total of 30.7% of patients used supportive care services, including hospice. There was no clinically significant change in patient satisfaction with oncology care providers, which was already high at baseline.

Ultimately, the researchers concluded that there is a need for better integration of palliative care for patients participating in phase I clinical trials, especially as patients move from treatment to supportive care at the end of their lives.

“Remember to always ask about symptoms and advanced medical directives, even in phase I patients because they will have symptoms,” Smith said. “And most of them want to have a discussion with us about advanced medical directives.”

Reference

Smith TJ, Chung V, Hughes MT, et. al. A randomized trial of palliative care intervention for patients on phase I studies. Presented at 2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Meeting. May 29-31. Abstract number: 12001.